<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/">

	<channel>
	  <!-- main channel info -->
        <title>Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank </title>
        <link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/topic/10509/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html</link>
        <description>
        <![CDATA[ Have any of you had a Tom Morgan Fiberglass rod?  I am thinking about ordering a 3 wt fiberglass blank from Tom and having a rod built.  Wondering if any of
you have any thoughts about Mr. Morgans rods....I know he is a legend.


The blank is $295 for a 2 pc 3wt.  A finished rod is (GULP) $1495!  I&#39;d do the blank and consider having the rest of the work done by someone like Andy at
Old Yankee Rod Smithing.


I wish I could afford the rod for Tom Morgan, but that will not happen any time... ]]>
        </description>

		<!-- optional elements -->
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2006, Kickapps</copyright>
		<managingEditor>feeds@kickapps.com (FeedMaster)</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>webmaster@kickapps.com (WebMaster)</webMaster>
		<!-- note: dates need to be RFC 822 formated "Sat, 07 Sep 2002 00:00:01 GMT" -->
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:05:36 GMT</pubDate>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:43:33 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>Kickapps Feeds 1.0</generator>
		<docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
		<!-- <cloud domain="rpc.kickapps.com" port="80" path="/RPC2" registerProcedure="pingMe" protocol="soap"/>-->
		<ttl>60</ttl>

		<rating>
		{pics-1.1 &quot;http://www.icra.org/ratingsv02.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (nz 1 vz 1 lz 1 oz 1 cz 1 ) &quot;http://www.rsac.org/ratingsv01.html&quot; l gen true for &quot;http://kickapps.com&quot; r (n 0 s 0 v 0 l 0 ))
		</rating>
		<textInput>
			<title>Search</title>
			<description>Search Domain</description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://kickapps.com/search/direct/</link>
		</textInput>
		<!-- skip
		<skipHours>
			<hour>23</hour>
		</skipHours>
		<skipDays>
			<day>Monday</day>
			<day>Wednesday</day>
			<day>Friday</day>
		</skipDays>-->
		<!-- extensions -->


		<!-- channel items -->
		<!-- descriptions should be shorter than 500 char to be polite -->
		<!-- html shoud be stripped or escaped -->
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/83083/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-83083</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Jgestar has it exactly right. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (16 pmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/83083</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:43:32 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/83081/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-83081</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Well, I&#39;ll try.  If you want an &quot;all purpose rod&quot; it is hard to beat an 8ish foot, 5 weight.  You can throw standard dries, nymphs, wets, midges,
little bucktails, and maybe some small poppers and other flies.  You can muscle a bigger if necessary or use a light tip line and long leader for delicacy. 
With an 8 foot, 5 weight you can probably have a good day on the water no matter what happens.
<br>
<br>
On the other hand, a rod designed for streamers is longer and throws a heavier line.  When you want to throw bigger stuff such as streamers, big nymphs, sofa
pillows, and such, the larger setup gets it done.  But you lose some delicacy as a result.  The streamer special will be a rod for bigger flies and, hopefully,
bigger fish.  On the other side, a 6&#39;9&quot; Yamame rod is shorter for a lighter line.  There is a big gain in delicacy, but you lose the ability to throw
a #6 cork popper.  The streamer rod and yamame rod can&#39;t &quot;do it all&quot;, so they are... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (jgestar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/83081</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:34:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/83066/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-83066</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Please explain &quot; specialized &quot; . I believe I know what you mean but I need a little more detail . ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Flickfly)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/83066</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 20:39:56 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/83062/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-83062</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;ve cast almost all the prototypes and would say the 8&#39; 5 wt. would be my choice for a single blank. It&#39;s exceptionally smooth and probably the
most versatile of the models. Tom considers the 8 1/2&#39; 7 wt. &quot;Unity with the Universe&quot; model to be one of the sweetest rods ever, and the
8&#39;3&quot; 6 wt. streamer model is a great streamer rod, but both are quite specialized, so I&#39;d go for the 8&#39; 5 wt. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (16 pmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/83062</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 19:01:43 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/83046/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-83046</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ For those who have communicated with Mr Morgan, is there one rod that is exceptional? Certainly any of the blanks will be great, but if one were to own one
blank which one? Need to save my pennies. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (JASTrout)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/83046</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 14:36:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82994/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82994</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Me too.  I can&#39;t wait to see what you will create from a Tom Morgan blank.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Tom
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (jgestar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82994</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:37:49 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82991/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82991</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Tom,
<br>
<br>
thanks for the clarification... good to hear he&#39;s still moving forward... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (hookjaw23)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82991</guid>
			<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 00:04:16 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82989/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82989</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I saw that comment on Clark&#39;s, too, and thought maybe it was Mike McFarland they were talking about and just got the makers mixed up. I did the same thing
in the current thread on Glastech rods with Dennis Franke&#39;s blank supplier prior to Mark Steffen--memories are imperfect animals.
<br>
-CC ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (cross creek one)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82989</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:38:13 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82986/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82986</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Nope, it ain&#39;t true.  I spoke with Tom Morgan last week and he reiterated that Kerry B will roll his glass blanks.  Indeed, Tom changed fiberglass
suppliers, but only the company that will supply the pre-preg fiberglass cloth for the rod production.  Tom is working out the details with the new pre-preg
supplier.  Hopefully no new problems crop up.  This project has had way more problems than Tom Morgan deserves.
<br>
<br>
It&#39;s not easy to start rolling your own glass blanks.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Tom
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (jgestar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82986</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 23:10:28 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82980/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82980</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ saw a thread on Clark&#39;s that implied Tom is setting up to do the blank rolling in house now... guess the blanks w/ Kerry weren&#39;t working out?
interesting... hope we see them someday... still would love to put one together...
<br>
<br>
-matt ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (hookjaw23)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82980</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:27:07 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82630/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82630</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I checked Tom&#39;s website today and he says that hopefully he will have the blanks by March 1st. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Arctic Grayling)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82630</guid>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:07:49 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82354/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82354</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I commented because I saw Tom has an order form for the glass blanks on his site. Perhaps he&#39;s taking orders in advance? ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (scud dog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82354</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:18:48 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82351/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82351</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I spoke with Tom Morgan on Monday.  Hopefully we will see the rods in early 2010.  There have been quite a few setbacks and some bad luck, but Tom is still
moving the project forward.  Stay tuned.
<br>
<br>
<br>
Tom
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (jgestar)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82351</guid>
			<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:17:35 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/82343/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-82343</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ From what I can tell, Tom Morgan&#39;s taking orders. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (scud dog)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/82343</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:13:20 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/78008/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-78008</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ No longer listed by Gudebrod, but I&#39;m sure some dealers still have it. 00 size nylon is still available in a few colors, too, and it hasn&#39;t been made
for quite a while.
<br>
-CC ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (cross creek one)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/78008</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:10:00 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/77993/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-77993</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">cross creek one wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  with maroon size A thread gone.
  <br>
</blockquote>still available,
<br>
through various online dealers - including mudhole.
<br>
<br>
Just ordered a spool last week...
<br>
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (corlay)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/77993</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 17:19:16 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/77990/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-77990</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ What they provided to me with the Stalker kits I got back then was Gudebrod #337 Maroon, size 00. When I finished the rods with that thread, it was an exact
match to a factory original Stalker I had available for comparison. I still have a little on a little styrofoam spool that they sent me, and it&#39;s
definitely maroon, not scarlett or garnet, which were the other two red shades. I&#39;d be surprised if they used another color thread on the glass rods than
they already had on large spools for tipping their bamboo rods. I don&#39;t know what was used on the Retro series rods from a few years ago, as 00 maroon
nylon had been discontinued by then and, as I understand it, Glenn Brackett had switched to silk for the bamboo rods. It could very well be that the Retros
were wrapped with whatever shade of red nylon they were using to tip the graphite rods. Now, of course, all 00 nylon has been discontinued and the color chart
for size A is much smaller, too, with maroon size A thread... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (cross creek one)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/77990</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 16:23:55 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/77987/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-77987</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Crosscreek, If your Stalker is like the other Winstons of that time, the thread color was red (may have been called crimson). The dark brown blank caused the
wraps to turn very dark red when finish was applied, so it sounds like you&#39;re on the right track for restoring your rod. ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (16 pmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/77987</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 14:40:11 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/77980/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-77980</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ <blockquote>
  <strong class="quote-title">jgestar wrote:</strong>
  <hr>
  I&#39;m planning on building at least an 8&#39;3&quot; Streamer Special. Once the blanks are available, there will be much rejoicing around the forum.
  <br>
  <br>
  The Morgan Rodsmiths blanks have an All Star pedigree. Tom Morgan designed some of the most renowned glass rods to hit the market - the Winston Stalkers. Dr.
  Tom is building with glass because he feels it&#39;s the best material for these rods. The prototypes were evaluated by rod builder Per Brandin (among
  others). Kerry Burkheimer&#39;s shop will roll the rods. Kerry learned rod design and fabrication from the legend Russ Peak.
  <br>
  <br>
  Yes, there is great anticipation.
  <br>
  <br>
  <br>
  Tom
  <br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think that the Streamer Special is a good choice.  I might even go with the Unity With the Universe blank.  When I was selecting a glass rod to fish beads
with ToneMike I realized that most of my fiberglass rods... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Arctic Grayling)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/77980</guid>
			<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 12:24:15 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Re: Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/reply/77887/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html#reply-77887</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ I&#39;ve cast the original prototypes of Tom&#39;s 3 wt. fiberglass blanks and, more recently, 5 different final prototype 3 wts. to be chosen for production.
Of those 5, 3 are 7 1/2&#39; and two are 8&#39;. One of each length is for the Japanese market and one of each length is for the U.S. market. The Japanese
versions are generally softer and slower than the U.S. versions of the same length. All are very good to outstanding, and I preferred the U.S. versions over
the Japanese ones. All have fine enough tips to cast nice loops in close and enough butt to cast easily out to medium (40-45&#39;) distances, though they are
really designed to fish at closer ranges (around 30&#39;). They are nicely balanced between butt and tip, and cast a nice flat line with minimal tip bounce. I
think they will please almost anybody who wants a fine moderate action fishing tool for small flies. I think the reason for the big price difference between
blank and finished rod is that Tom&#39;s wife Gerri,... ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (16 pmd)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/sreply/77887</guid>
			<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:25:09 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[ Tom Morgan Fiberglass Blank  ]]></title>
			<link>http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/topic/10509/t/Tom-Morgan-Fiberglass-Blank.html</link>
			<description><![CDATA[ Have any of you had a Tom Morgan Fiberglass rod?  I am thinking about ordering a 3 wt fiberglass blank from Tom and having a rod built.  Wondering if any of
you have any thoughts about Mr. Morgans rods....I know he is a legend.
<br>
<br>
The blank is $295 for a 2 pc 3wt.  A finished rod is (GULP) $1495!  I&#39;d do the blank and consider having the rest of the work done by someone like Andy at
Old Yankee Rod Smithing.
<br>
<br>
I wish I could afford the rod for Tom Morgan, but that will not happen any time soon.
<br>
<br>
Thank you.
<br>
<br>
FRD
<br> ]]></description>

			<!-- optional elements -->
			<author>feeds@kickapps.com (Fly Rod D)</author>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://fiberglassflyrodders.info/topic/10509</guid>
			<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:05:36 PST</pubDate>
			<!-- extensions -->

		</item>
    <!-- end items -->

  </channel>
</rss>